Achieving urban resilience and sustainability is an endeavor involving a nexus of various policies, actions, and projects that interact in a dynamic and complex way, thus making their evaluation a hard task. Focusing on the use of indicators for monitoring and evaluating this effort, there is considerable work done that has provided with several groups of indicators for use from public agencies at the regional and local government levels. This paper investigates with the use of specific case studies defined in the context of the NBSINFRA research project, the level of implementation of indicators-based monitoring and evaluation systems for urban resilience and sustainability. Starting from the identification through literature review of a large number of indicators proposed for this task, it examines through data collected from city hubs that have implemented Nature-based Solutions (NbS), the extent of the indicators’ use and the reasons behind any limitations for this use. It also discusses the motivation for selecting a specific group of indicators and it investigates this selection in relation to organizational, institutional, and other aspects that affect public agencies’ mode of practice. At the same time, the relation between the selection of particular groups of indicators and the implemented NbS is also investigated. The conclusions of this survey reveal some interesting aspects on the indicators-based approach for monitoring and evaluating urban resilience and sustainability. Furthermore, it highlights the factors that determine suitability and preference of specific indicators-based metric systems; hence, based on these conclusions, the selection in the first place and then the design of the indicators-based system can be facilitated towards implementing an effective indicators-based monitoring and evaluation of urban resilience and sustainability.